Models used to frame the decision

These lenses help the evidence, recommendation, and next move land with the right audience.

Available decision conversations

Choose the story the room needs.

Findings need to land with leadership. These presentation templates structure evidence and recommendations into decision-ready decks.

Process Reality and Redesign Presentation

Visual Hybrid Model

Present the observed process reality, intervention scope, and decision points in a concise executive format.

It helps you: A decision-ready presentation deck covering problem frame, evidence frame, recommendation frame.

Assembled from the visual hybrid process visibility proposal proposal outputs.

See the full template structure

Opening frame

  • Engagement objective and process boundary.
  • Current-state visibility gap summary.
  • Decision context for redesign priorities.

Problem frame

  • Documented versus observed pathway mismatch.
  • High-friction handoffs and rework concentration.
  • Operational and customer impact statement.

Evidence frame

  • Observation excerpts and hotspot evidence.
  • Cycle-time variation snapshots.
  • Root-cause themes and reliability gaps.

Recommendation frame

  • Intervention package with owner accountability.
  • Expected improvement profile.
  • Dependencies and non-negotiable controls.

Implementation frame

  • 30/60/90-day delivery milestones.
  • Pilot, validation, and rollout checkpoints.
  • Governance cadence and review rhythm.

Decision frame

  • Scope approval decision.
  • Sponsor and owner confirmation.
  • Mobilisation start and first checkpoint date.

Process Health Intervention Presentation

Process Health Diagnostic

Translate health assessment findings into an executive intervention narrative with sequencing and risk controls.

It helps you: A decision-ready presentation deck covering problem frame, evidence frame, recommendation frame.

Assembled from the process health intervention proposal proposal outputs.

See the full template structure

Opening frame

  • Health profile overview and intervention intent.
  • Most constrained dimensions and impact exposure.
  • Decision context for stabilisation-first sequencing.

Problem frame

  • Control and adaptability constraints.
  • Cycle-time and exception volatility.
  • Risk of optimisation before stabilisation.

Evidence frame

  • Dimension rationale and source evidence.
  • Trend indicators and exception patterns.
  • Cross-role diagnosis consistency checks.

Recommendation frame

  • Staged intervention priorities and owner roles.
  • Control reinforcement actions.
  • Expected outcomes by phase.

Implementation frame

  • Phase 1: stabilise controls.
  • Phase 2: improve efficiency with guardrails.
  • Phase 3: consolidate and embed cadence.

Decision frame

  • Approve phase-one initiation.
  • Confirm intervention governance participants.
  • Set first 30-day review date.

Dual Effort Reduction Presentation

Dual Effort Framework

Present a unified customer-and-employee effort reduction case with prioritised intervention moments.

It helps you: A decision-ready presentation deck covering problem frame, evidence frame, recommendation frame.

Assembled from the dual effort reduction proposal proposal outputs.

See the full template structure

Opening frame

  • Dual-burden thesis and engagement objective.
  • Top overlap moments affecting CX and EX.
  • Decision context for pilot scope selection.

Problem frame

  • Repeat-contact and recovery-work linkage.
  • Context fragmentation across handoffs.
  • Operational load concentration points.

Evidence frame

  • Journey-stage burden heat spots.
  • Workaround and escalation patterns.
  • Observed impact on resolution quality.

Recommendation frame

  • Targeted burden-reduction intervention set.
  • Frontline enablement adjustments.
  • Expected CX/EX improvement outcomes.

Implementation frame

  • Pilot one high-volume overlap moment.
  • Validate burden reduction and quality lift.
  • Scale intervention with governance controls.

Decision frame

  • Approve pilot scenario and owner set.
  • Commit to review cadence and thresholds.
  • Authorise broader rollout on checkpoint outcomes.

Opportunity Portfolio Presentation

Opportunity Matrix

Present a sequenced opportunity portfolio with trade-off transparency and decision-ready implementation phasing.

It helps you: A decision-ready presentation deck covering problem frame, evidence frame, recommendation frame.

Assembled from the opportunity portfolio delivery proposal proposal outputs.

See the full template structure

Opening frame

  • Portfolio objective and prioritisation logic.
  • Quick-win and strategic tranche balance.
  • Decision context for funding and sequencing.

Problem frame

  • Capacity dilution from low-value work.
  • Strategic deferral caused by dependency ambiguity.
  • Delivery confidence risk under current sequencing.

Evidence frame

  • Impact/effort/readiness rationale summaries.
  • Dependency mapping highlights.
  • Resourcing constraints and risk indicators.

Recommendation frame

  • Launch quick-win set with explicit owners.
  • Open strategic tranche one with controls.
  • Defer low-value opportunities consuming core capacity.

Implementation frame

  • Month 1 quick-win delivery and baseline checks.
  • Month 2 strategic tranche mobilisation.
  • Quarterly rebalance and governance checkpoint.

Decision frame

  • Approve tranche scope and funding boundaries.
  • Confirm portfolio governance forum.
  • Start weekly execution cadence.

Readiness Activation Presentation

Operational Readiness Profile

Present readiness gaps, activation gates, and precondition closure sequence for safe mobilisation.

It helps you: A decision-ready presentation deck covering problem frame, evidence frame, recommendation frame.

Assembled from the readiness activation proposal proposal outputs.

See the full template structure

Opening frame

  • Readiness status and activation objective.
  • Critical blockers to immediate scale-up.
  • Decision context for precondition package approval.

Problem frame

  • Sponsor alignment and capacity imbalance.
  • Data readiness and integrity constraints.
  • Risk of mobilisation before closure.

Evidence frame

  • Readiness threshold status by criterion.
  • Capacity and ownership evidence snapshots.
  • Precondition dependency map.

Recommendation frame

  • Close preconditions in staged sequence.
  • Apply explicit activation gates.
  • Transition to delivery only on threshold compliance.

Implementation frame

  • Week 1 ownership and sponsorship closure.
  • Week 2 capacity and data correction actions.
  • Week 3 go/no-go gate and mobilisation decision.

Decision frame

  • Approve readiness closure package.
  • Assign gate owners and review dates.
  • Authorize transition plan preparation.

Governance Sustainability Presentation

Process Governance Model

Present governance operating model decisions required to sustain process performance and ownership clarity.

It helps you: A decision-ready presentation deck covering problem frame, evidence frame, recommendation frame.

Assembled from the governance sustainability proposal proposal outputs.

See the full template structure

Opening frame

  • Governance objective and sustainability context.
  • Current ownership and decision friction points.
  • Decision context for governance model adoption.

Problem frame

  • Unclear decision rights causing delays.
  • Weak exception resolution rhythm.
  • Performance drift after prior improvements.

Evidence frame

  • Escalation and unresolved exception examples.
  • Meeting effectiveness and action follow-through evidence.
  • Ownership gap map by process stage.

Recommendation frame

  • Adopt minimum effective governance model.
  • Approve decision-rights and escalation structure.
  • Set fortnightly governance rhythm.

Implementation frame

  • Fortnight 1 role and rights confirmation.
  • Fortnight 2 operating rhythm activation.
  • Month 2 adoption review and refinement.

Decision frame

  • Approve governance setup scope.
  • Confirm owners and sponsor cadence.
  • Authorize implementation start checkpoint.

Vital Signs Monitoring Presentation

Process Vital Signs

Present process drift monitoring design, threshold governance, and intervention response decisions.

It helps you: A decision-ready presentation deck covering problem frame, evidence frame, recommendation frame.

Assembled from the vital signs monitoring proposal proposal outputs.

See the full template structure

Opening frame

  • Monitoring objective and indicator strategy.
  • Current drift detection and response gaps.
  • Decision context for indicator governance approval.

Problem frame

  • Threshold breaches with delayed intervention.
  • Inconsistent metric interpretation by team.
  • Reactive response patterns increasing risk exposure.

Evidence frame

  • Drift timeline and intervention-lag snapshots.
  • Indicator quality and signal reliability notes.
  • Response outcome variance examples.

Recommendation frame

  • Approve compact indicator set and thresholds.
  • Adopt standard trigger-response protocol.
  • Embed monitoring in governance cadence.

Implementation frame

  • Week 1 final definitions and ownership assignment.
  • Week 2 response protocol test execution.
  • Week 4 threshold calibration and closure.

Decision frame

  • Approve monitoring package scope.
  • Confirm review participants and cadence.
  • Authorize baseline monitoring launch.
Ready to start

When the decision is aligned, the next step is to choose the process improvement engagement that fits.

Choose a service

Start Sprint Audit discussion

Email hello@frameworklab.co.nz

Send a message

Not sure where to start?

Tell us a bit about what is not working and we will recommend the best next step.

We will respond within two business days. No sales pitch, just a straightforward conversation about what might help.

↑ Top